Peec AI ↗
Recurring prompt analytics and multi-project measurement are the main need.
← All toolsAnother direction / 01 Another direction / 02 Another direction / 03
The selection guideSource-backed research ↗
AI Search Monitoring / AI search visibility monitoring platform with citation intelligence, technical GEO audits, and action workflows.
Franixo
AI search visibility monitoring with citation intelligence and evidence-backed actions
AI answer monitoringCitation intelligenceGEO action workflows
Why it stands out
Clear public pricing, pooled limits, provider coverage, and trial boundaries.
Source review: · Public-source research, not a hands-on test
↗ Best for
Marketing and content teams establishing a recurring buyer-question baseline.
! Know before you buy
No independent customer-review sample or controlled product test was found; accuracy, repeatability, causal lift, and revenue attribution remain unverified.
01 / Editorial assessment
Is Franixo for you?
The AICiteKit take
Franixo is a credible shortlist option for teams that want recurring AI-search measurement connected to citation evidence and an action workflow. Its public pages document plan limits, separate Google Search Surfaces, pooled quotas, GA4 referral context, and MCP access on higher tiers. The evidence is stronger for live product scope and commercial boundaries than for measurement quality: no independent customer-review sample or controlled product test was found in this pass. Scores and before/after comparisons should be treated as observations over configured prompts and providers, not universal rankings or causal proof. Buyers should confirm model versions, language and region coverage, raw-answer retention, exports, API/MCP limits, and quota behavior across brands before purchase.
A good fit if you are…
- Marketing and content teams establishing a recurring buyer-question baseline.
- SEO/GEO specialists connecting technical audits and citation gaps to actions.
- Agencies needing multi-brand and white-label report workflows.
Consider another option if…
- Buyers requiring independent accuracy or causal-lift validation.
- Teams needing every AI provider and Google surface on the entry plan.
- Procurement teams requiring a fully documented raw-data export and API contract.
02 / Scope, not promises
Features & coverage
- Provider coverage
Starter lists OpenAI, Perplexity, Gemini; Growth adds Claude and Microsoft Copilot; Agency adds DeepSeek and Grok. Growth and Agency add Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode.
Archived research · Plan-specific; verify model and regionResearch excerpt · Engine, language, and region coverage- Pooled limits
Starter/Growth/Agency list 15/50/150 pooled prompts, 1/3/10 brands, and 3/10/10 confirmed competitors.
Archived research · Workspace-level limitsResearch excerpt · Pricing and limits- Integrations
GA4 referral traffic is included on all listed plans; MCP access is listed for Growth and Agency.
Archived research · Plan-specific accessResearch excerpt · AI referral traffic
Visibility and competitor monitoring
Franixo lists AI Visibility Score, mention and recommendation rate, average position, Share of Voice, competitor discovery, confirmed competitors, and historical snapshots. These are sample statistics over configured prompts and providers, not universal rankings.
Citation intelligence and opportunities
The product describes citation extraction, classification, source frequency, historical evidence, and ranked Citation Opportunities. The FAQ states that an opportunity does not guarantee improved visibility; public pages do not establish precision or recall.
Technical GEO audit and GA4
Technical GEO Audit checks crawler access, robots.txt, status, canonical, metadata, structured data, server-rendered content, headings, and sitemap inclusion. GA4 adds aggregate attributed sessions and conversions, not causal proof.
MCP and agency reporting
Growth and Agency list MCP access, while Agency adds client/portfolio reports and white-label report output. Confirm authentication scope, rate limits, raw exports, and client permissions.
A focused evaluation workflow
- Add the brand, buyer questions, and candidate competitors.
- Run weekly observations across the provider and Google Search Surface coverage in the plan.
- Inspect visibility, Share of Voice, competitors, sources, and citations.
- Turn citation gaps and evidence into prioritized actions or task drafts.
- Connect GA4 for aggregate attributed AI referral context.
- Re-run a stable prompt panel and compare changes as association, not causation.
03 / Commercial boundaries
Pricing & limits
Terms below reflect the 2026-10-15 source review, not a new live quote. Confirm currency, billing term, tax and required scope with the provider.
- Entry price
Starter is $39/month with a 14-day free trial and no card required; it is not a free recurring plan.
Archived research · Official pricing checked 2026-10-15Research excerpt · Pricing and limits- One-time report
AI Visibility Report is $18 one time, with no account or subscription required.
Archived research · Official product and FAQ checked 2026-10-15Research excerpt · Pricing and limits- Pooled limits
Starter/Growth/Agency list 15/50/150 pooled prompts, 1/3/10 brands, and 3/10/10 confirmed competitors.
Archived research · Workspace-level limitsResearch excerpt · Pricing and limits
Your buying checklist
Get these answers first.
- Which model versions, countries, languages, and Search Surfaces are included?
- Are prompt, brand, competitor, seat, and task-draft limits pooled across the workspace?
- What raw answers, cited URLs, timestamps, exports, retention, and API/MCP limits are available?
- How are Citation Opportunities classified and deduplicated?
- Which GA4 fields are read, retained, and deleted on disconnect?
Pricing context & qualifications
Research checked 2026-10-15. Official pricing lists Starter $39/month, Growth $89/month, Agency $299/month, annual billing at a 17% discount, and a separate $18 one-time AI Visibility Report. Prompt, brand, competitor, seat, and task-draft limits are pooled or plan-specific; confirm taxes, model versions, retention, exports, and API/MCP terms.
04 / The tradeoffs
Strengths & weaknesses
Reasons to shortlist
- Clear public pricing, pooled limits, provider coverage, and trial boundaries.
- Connects visibility, competitor, citation, recommendation, and later comparison workflows.
- Technical GEO audit and GA4 referral context are documented.
- Growth and Agency plans list MCP access and Agency white-label reports.
Reasons to pause
- No independent user-review sample or controlled Franixo test was found.
- Provider, Google surface, prompt, brand, seat, and task-draft limits vary by plan.
- Public pages do not fully specify citation accuracy, raw-answer retention, exports, or API rate limits.
- Visibility changes are observational and do not prove causal lift or revenue incrementality.
No independent customer-review sample or controlled product test was found; accuracy, repeatability, causal lift, and revenue attribution remain unverified.
05 / Choose by the job
Alternatives to consider
Editorial fit comparisons—not performance rankings or claims that one option always wins.
Otterly.AI ↗
A monitoring-first workflow with a broader public comparison footprint is preferred.
SE Visible ↗
The team already works in the SE Ranking ecosystem.
06 / What we can substantiate
Reviews & evidence
No independent customer-review sample or controlled Franixo test was found in this pass. ScopeonAI independently identifies the company and product relationship, but it is company-controlled identity evidence. CitedIndex is discovery-only. Product scope and pricing are therefore medium-confidence vendor-reported facts rather than independently validated performance claims.
AICiteKit assessment: public-source research, not a hands-on product test. Official materials establish stated scope; reviews are dated and may concern the broader platform. Neither establishes guaranteed citations, traffic or revenue.
Sources & original verification dates
| Source | Evidence type | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Franixo product workflow ↗ | Official product page | |
| Franixo capability reference ↗ | Official features page | |
| Franixo pricing and plan limits ↗ | Official pricing page | |
| Franixo FAQ and methodology boundaries ↗ | Official FAQ | |
| Franixo product changelog ↗ | Official release history | |
| ScopeonAI company and products ↗ | Company identity cross-check; company-controlled source | |
| CitedIndex Franixo listing ↗ | Directory discovery source; not quality evidence |
Original review evidence & date context
Preserved from the published research. Dates, review counts and product-scope qualifications below have not been refreshed by this layout migration.
Evidence checked 2026-10-15. Official pages support the product surface, plan boundaries, methodology descriptions, and release timeline. ScopeonAI independently identifies the company/product relationship but is company-controlled. No independent customer-review sample or controlled product test was found. CitedIndex is discovery evidence only. Citation accuracy, repeatability, causal visibility lift, traffic incrementality, and revenue attribution are not established.
Research notes & unresolved discrepancies
- Official product, features, pricing, FAQ, and changelog pages were rechecked on 2026-10-15.
- ScopeonAI was used as a company identity cross-check, not as a customer review or product test.
- CitedIndex was used only for candidate discovery.
- No independent product test or customer-review sample was found; outcome and accuracy claims remain unverified.
Layout migration: October 4, 2026. The original MDX research is retained in the repository; this reorganization does not refresh its factual verification dates.