Geoptie ↗
Geoptie · hosted GEO audit plus query and AI-mention workflows · more managed product surface
← All toolsAnother direction / 01 Another direction / 02 Another direction / 03
The selection guideSource-backed research ↗
AI Search Monitoring / Free open-source technical GEO page audit.
HITZ GEO Page Audit
A free open-source check for AI-answer readiness
Technical GEO auditAI-answer readiness researchOpen-source tooling
Why it stands out
Transparent four-category scoring rubric with documented weights.
Source review: · Public-source research, not a hands-on test
↗ Best for
Content and SEO teams checking important pages before broader GEO work.
! Know before you buy
One public URL; reads HTML and structured data for observable answer, entity, trust, and technical signals.
01 / Editorial assessment
Is HITZ GEO Page Audit for you?
The AICiteKit take
HITZ GEO Page Audit is a useful low-friction diagnostic for teams that want to inspect whether a page contains direct answer text, a clear entity, trust signals, and readable technical structure. Its public repository exposes the implementation, tests, weighting, MIT license, and Cloudflare Workers route, making the score more inspectable than a black-box AI-readiness badge. The boundary is equally important: this is a rules-based one-page self-check, not evidence that ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, or another engine will cite or recommend the page. Independent product-specific validation and user feedback were not found, so pair it with repeated prompt tests and source analysis.
A good fit if you are…
- Content and SEO teams checking important pages before broader GEO work.
- Technical SEOs and developers who value a transparent rubric and self-hosting path.
- Agencies teaching the difference between page readiness and live AI visibility.
Consider another option if…
- Teams needing continuous multi-engine prompt monitoring or competitor share of voice.
- Enterprise procurement requiring public SLA, retention, access-control, or compliance evidence.
- Buyers looking for independently validated citation or traffic outcomes.
02 / Scope, not promises
Features & coverage
- Score model
0–100 score across answer (30%), entity (25%), trust (25%), and technical (20%) signals.
Archived research · Repository implementation and documentation checked 2026-10-14; confirm future revisions.Research excerpt · Four-category page score- Audit scope
One public URL; reads HTML and structured data for observable answer, entity, trust, and technical signals.
Archived research · Official page and repository checked 2026-10-14.Research excerpt · HTML and structured-data inspection- Open-source route
MIT-licensed repository with tests and a Cloudflare Workers deployment path.
Archived research · Official audit page and repository checked 2026-10-14.Research excerpt · Open-source and self-hosting route
Transparent four-category score
The repository documents answer, entity, trust, and technical categories with 30/25/25/20 weights and observable page signals. This is an inspectable project rubric, not a universal ranking model used by AI providers.
HTML and structured-data inspection
The live page and repository describe reading a public page's HTML and structured data. The result can flag page-level gaps but cannot establish that an AI engine retrieved, trusted, or cited the page.
Open-source and self-hosting route
The geo-audit repository publishes code, tests, MIT licensing, and Cloudflare Workers configuration. Self-hosting improves inspectability but transfers infrastructure, monitoring, privacy, and usage responsibilities to the operator.
Evidence boundary
Public evidence supports a live free tool and transparent implementation. No checked independent source validates score accuracy, citation lift, engine coverage, or business outcomes.
A focused evaluation workflow
- Choose one representative public page that matters to a buyer journey.
- Run the audit and record the category-level findings rather than treating the total as a ranking score.
- Fix the lowest-scoring observable signal, such as a missing direct answer, entity marker, source, or access rule.
- Re-run the audit and keep the before/after result as a technical change record.
- Use the adjacent HITZ crawler, schema, entity, and prompt-map tools where relevant.
- Validate important conclusions with repeated prompts in the answer engines and inspect cited sources separately.
03 / Commercial boundaries
Pricing & limits
Terms below reflect the 2026-10-14 source review, not a new live quote. Confirm currency, billing term, tax and required scope with the provider.
- Price
Free public tool; official directory says the six HITZ tools work without signup.
Archived research · Official tools directory checked 2026-10-14.Research excerpt · Pricing and limits- Open-source route
MIT-licensed repository with tests and a Cloudflare Workers deployment path.
Archived research · Official audit page and repository checked 2026-10-14.Research excerpt · Open-source and self-hosting route
Pricing context & qualifications
The official tools directory checked 2026-10-14 says all six HITZ tools are free and work without signup. The geo-audit repository is MIT-licensed and documents Cloudflare Workers deployment. Confirm hosted quotas, retention, privacy, and infrastructure costs before operational use.
04 / The tradeoffs
Strengths & weaknesses
Reasons to shortlist
- Transparent four-category scoring rubric with documented weights.
- Free public tool with no-signup wording on the official directory.
- Open-source code, tests, MIT license, and Cloudflare Workers deployment route.
- Works as a focused first step alongside crawler, entity, schema, and prompt-map checks.
Reasons to pause
- A page score does not prove retrieval, citation, recommendation, traffic, or revenue outcomes.
- Independent HITZ-specific ratings, reviews, and controlled accuracy tests were not found.
- Hosted quotas, retention, uptime, privacy guarantees, and support terms are not published in checked sources.
- Scope is one public URL and observable HTML/structured-data signals, not full GEO measurement.
One public URL; reads HTML and structured data for observable answer, entity, trust, and technical signals.
05 / Choose by the job
Alternatives to consider
Editorial fit comparisons—not performance rankings or claims that one option always wins.
OpenSEO ↗
OpenSEO · broader SEO/GEO research with MCP and self-hosting · more developer-oriented
SE Visible ↗
SE Visible · recurring AI-search visibility monitoring · more focused on tracking over page audits
06 / What we can substantiate
Reviews & evidence
No checked independent source provides a HITZ-specific rating, review count, hands-on comparison, or outcome study. The public repositories provide inspectability through source code and tests, while Entlify supplies only category-level GEO-audit context. These signals support product existence and transparency, not score accuracy or citation efficacy.
AICiteKit assessment: public-source research, not a hands-on product test. Official materials establish stated scope; reviews are dated and may concern the broader platform. Neither establishes guaranteed citations, traffic or revenue.
Sources & original verification dates
| Source | Evidence type | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| HITZ GEO Page Audit ↗ | Official product page | |
| HITZ GEO Tools directory ↗ | Official tools directory | |
| HITZ geo-audit GitHub repository ↗ | Vendor-controlled open-source repository | |
| HITZ GEO Tools GitHub repository ↗ | Vendor-controlled open-source repository | |
| Entlify GEO audit guide ↗ | Independent category-level editorial context; not a HITZ test | |
| CitedIndex HITZ GEO Page Audit listing ↗ | Directory discovery source; not quality evidence |
Original review evidence & date context
Preserved from the published research. Dates, review counts and product-scope qualifications below have not been refreshed by this layout migration.
Evidence snapshot
| Source | Public signal | What it supports | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| HITZ GEO Page Audit | Free audit for answer, entity, trust, and technical signals; open-source wording | Vendor-stated workflow and availability | High for stated behavior; not efficacy evidence |
| HITZ GEO Tools | Six free tools, no-signup wording, adjacent crawler/entity/schema/prompt checks | Toolkit scope and commercial boundary | High for published positioning |
| geo-audit repository | Public code, tests, weights, MIT license, Cloudflare Worker route | Inspectability and self-hosting path | Medium-to-high; vendor-controlled |
| HITZ GEO Tools repository | Lists six tools and links live implementations | Product identity and workflow context | Medium; vendor-controlled |
| Entlify GEO audit guide | Independent category-level discussion and limitations | General market context, not HITZ validation | Low for HITZ-specific claims |
No checked independent source provides a HITZ-specific rating, review sample, controlled score validation, citation-accuracy test, or outcome study.
Research notes & unresolved discrepancies
- Official HITZ GEO Page Audit and tools directory checked 2026-10-14.
- HITZ geo-audit and HITZ GEO Tools repositories were checked for implementation, tests, license, scope, and deployment claims.
- Entlify was used for independent category-level context, not product validation.
- CitedIndex was used for candidate discovery only, not quality evidence.
- No checked source proves citation accuracy, model coverage, rankings, traffic, conversions, revenue lift, security, retention, or enterprise SLA.
Layout migration: October 4, 2026. The original MDX research is retained in the repository; this reorganization does not refresh its factual verification dates.