A·K
← All tools
The selection guideSource-backed research ↗
AI Search Monitoring / Open-source Agent Skill for evidence-first SEO and AEO/GEO website audits.

seo-aeo-audit

Evidence-first SEO and AEO/GEO audits for agent workflows

SEO and AEO/GEO auditingEvidence-backed change planningAgent-native open-source workflows
Why it stands out

Explicit evidence tiers and observation-based findings.

Source review: · Public-source research, not a hands-on test

↗ Best for

Technical SEO and GEO practitioners needing a structured audit framework.

! Know before you buy

No checked source independently validates audit accuracy, citation lift, rankings, traffic, conversions, revenue, security, compliance, or complete engine coverage.

01 / Editorial assessment

Is seo-aeo-audit for you?

The AICiteKit take

seo-aeo-audit is a credible open-source option for practitioners who want an AI-assisted audit to show observations and evidence instead of collapsing the result into a proprietary score. Its public method spans technical SEO, extractability, entity consensus, AI-search measurement, risk, and verification. The npm package and MIT repository make distribution inspectable. The boundary is that this is an audit workflow, not proof that a site will rank or be cited: public activity and the independent skills.sh listing corroborate availability, but do not validate recommendations, citation accuracy, or business outcomes.

A good fit if you are…

  • Technical SEO and GEO practitioners needing a structured audit framework.
  • Agencies producing dated audit and prioritized-plan artifacts.
  • Developers using coding agents who prefer inspectable open-source workflows.

Consider another option if…

  • Buyers wanting a managed dashboard or scheduled visibility monitoring.
  • Non-technical teams needing vendor setup, support, or an enterprise SLA.
  • Teams seeking proven citation lift, ranking improvement, or revenue attribution.

02 / Scope, not promises

Features & coverage

Audit scope

The public README documents ten tracks covering access, canonicalization, architecture, intent, content value, extractability/AEO/GEO, entity consensus, experience, risk, and measurement.

Archived research · Official repository checked 2026-11-02.Research excerpt · Ten-track audit workflow
Evidence method

The documented method uses CONFIRMED, STUDY, FIELD, and HYPOTHESIS tiers and prioritizes Blockers, Leaks, Gains, and Experiments.

Archived research · Official repository and documentation checked 2026-11-02.Research excerpt · Evidence tiers and triage
Package identity

The exact scoped npm package is @ssheleg/seo-aeo-audit, version 0.32.4, with the matching GitHub repository and project homepage.

Archived research · npm registry metadata checked 2026-11-02.Research excerpt · Installers and package distribution

Ten-track SEO and AEO/GEO audit

The public repository documents a workflow spanning technical access, content value, extractability, entity consensus, risk, and measurement. This supports documented scope, not guaranteed completeness for every site.

Archived research context ↗

Evidence-tiered prioritization

Findings are documented with evidence tiers and grouped into Blockers, Leaks, Gains, and Experiments. The project says recommendations should include a verification method and realistic horizon.

Archived research context ↗

Open-source agent distribution

The MIT repository, exact scoped npm package, and multiple Agent Skills-compatible install routes make the workflow inspectable and portable. Agent and model costs remain external.

Archived research context ↗

Evidence boundary

GitHub activity and skills.sh installs corroborate public availability, but no checked source independently validates audit accuracy, citation lift, ranking improvement, or business outcomes.

Archived research context ↗

A focused evaluation workflow
  1. Install the exact scoped package or Agent Skill route.
  2. Run a narrow audit on a representative site section.
  3. Check each finding against the target property's HTML, logs, analytics, and search surfaces.
  4. Separate confirmed observations from study, field, and hypothesis recommendations.
  5. Prioritize the plan and record a verification method before making changes.
  6. Re-audit with controlled comparisons rather than treating an improved report as proof of causality.

03 / Commercial boundaries

Pricing & limits

Terms below reflect the 2026-11-02 source review, not a new live quote. Confirm currency, billing term, tax and required scope with the provider.

License and price

MIT-licensed open-source repository; no hosted subscription price was found for the skill itself.

Archived research · Official repository and npm metadata checked 2026-11-02.Research excerpt · Pricing and limits
Package identity

The exact scoped npm package is @ssheleg/seo-aeo-audit, version 0.32.4, with the matching GitHub repository and project homepage.

Archived research · npm registry metadata checked 2026-11-02.Research excerpt · Installers and package distribution

Pricing context & qualifications

The skill is MIT-licensed and publicly installable through the exact scoped npm package and documented Agent Skills routes. No hosted subscription price was found for the skill itself. Model, crawling, search, analytics, and other data-provider costs depend on the user’s execution environment.

04 / The tradeoffs

Strengths & weaknesses

Reasons to shortlist

  • Explicit evidence tiers and observation-based findings.
  • Broad ten-track scope from crawl access through AEO/GEO and measurement.
  • MIT-licensed repository with exact npm distribution identity.
  • Outputs a prioritized change plan rather than only a scalar score.

Reasons to pause

  • Agent, model, site-access, and data-provider requirements remain buyer responsibilities.
  • No checked source proves audit accuracy, citation lift, rankings, traffic, or revenue outcomes.
  • Public sources do not establish a complete model, region, language, API, or retention matrix.
  • No checked source establishes a hosted dashboard, SLA, security audit, or compliance certification.

No checked source independently validates audit accuracy, citation lift, rankings, traffic, conversions, revenue, security, compliance, or complete engine coverage.

05 / Choose by the job

Alternatives to consider

Editorial fit comparisons—not performance rankings or claims that one option always wins.

Another direction / 01

Geo SEO Claude ↗

Geo SEO Claude · Claude-focused GEO implementation workflow · compare engine coverage and evidence

Another direction / 02

Open SEO MCP Skills ↗

Open SEO MCP Skills · MCP-connected SEO data and agent workflows · compare audit depth

Another direction / 03

Ansvisor ↗

Ansvisor · AI-search execution and visibility platform · compare hosted access and pricing

06 / What we can substantiate

Reviews & evidence

Public feedback evidence is limited. The independent skills.sh listing provides a 275-install distribution signal and GitHub metadata shows 3 stars and 1 fork, but neither is a review or outcome study. No checked source supplies a representative user sample, independent hands-on benchmark, satisfaction rating, or controlled test of audit recommendations.

skills.sh distribution listing

275 total installs observed 2026-11-02

Install count is a distribution/interest signal, not a quality, satisfaction, or efficacy measure.

Snapshot: 2026-11-02 · View source

GitHub public activity

3 stars, 1 fork, and active commits observed 2026-11-02

Repository activity does not independently validate the method or outcomes.

Snapshot: 2026-11-02 · View source

AICiteKit assessment: public-source research, not a hands-on product test. Official materials establish stated scope; reviews are dated and may concern the broader platform. Neither establishes guaranteed citations, traffic or revenue.

Sources & original verification dates

SourceEvidence typeChecked
Official seo-aeo-audit GitHub repository ↗Official public repository
Exact scoped npm package ↗Official distribution registry
Project documentation ↗Official documentation
GitHub repository API metadata ↗Independent public metadata surface
skills.sh listing ↗Independent distribution directory

Original review evidence & date context

Preserved from the published research. Dates, review counts and product-scope qualifications below have not been refreshed by this layout migration.

Evidence snapshot

SourcePublic signalWhat it supportsConfidence
Official GitHub repositoryTen-track method, MIT license, install routes, outputs, and limitationsProject-stated scope and inspectable implementationHigh for stated behavior; not independent efficacy
npm registry packageExact scoped package @ssheleg/seo-aeo-audit, v0.32.4, repository and homepageDistribution identity and package metadataHigh for published metadata
Project documentationEvidence panel and workflow documentationIntended method and user-facing explanationHigh for stated method; authored by project
skills.sh275 total installs observed 2026-11-02Independent distribution/interest signalLow-to-medium; not a review
GitHub API metadata3 stars, 1 fork, active commitsPublic activity and availabilityLow-to-medium; not efficacy evidence

No checked source independently validates audit accuracy, citation lift, rankings, traffic, conversions, revenue, security, compliance, or complete engine coverage.

Research notes & unresolved discrepancies
  • Official repository, npm package, project documentation, GitHub API metadata, and skills.sh listing checked 2026-11-02.
  • Product Hunt, Indie Hackers, and Peerlist direct pages were blocked during discovery; no verified current launch record was used.
  • No checked source proves citation accuracy, model coverage, rankings, traffic, conversions, revenue lift, security audit, compliance certification, privacy guarantee, or enterprise SLA.

Layout migration: October 4, 2026. The original MDX research is retained in the repository; this reorganization does not refresh its factual verification dates.