Otterly.AI ↗
Otterly.AI · established visibility monitoring · compare engine coverage and prompt limits
← All toolsAnother direction / 01 Another direction / 02 Another direction / 03
The selection guideSource-backed research ↗
AI Search Monitoring / AI-search citation monitoring and GEO visibility platform.
WhyIQ AI Radar
Weekly AI citation monitoring across five answer engines
AI-search visibility monitoringCitation analysisAgency reporting
Why it stands out
Five named engines included at the SMB entry tier.
Source review: · Public-source research, not a hands-on test
↗ Best for
Small teams needing five-engine weekly citation checks.
! Know before you buy
AlternativeTo provides third-party listing context and Reddit provides a founder-authored community mention; neither validates product accuracy or outcomes.
01 / Editorial assessment
Is WhyIQ AI Radar for you?
The AICiteKit take
WhyIQ AI Radar is a credible focused option for teams that want five-engine citation monitoring at a published $29/month entry price. Official documentation clearly describes prompt allowances, weekly cadence, verbatim answers, market setup, and Agency's three-pass confidence band. Independent user-feedback evidence is sparse and partly founder-authored, so no checked source validates citation accuracy, GEO outcomes, or business impact. Buyers should treat the dashboard as directional evidence and validate important decisions with repeated, representative queries.
A good fit if you are…
- Small teams needing five-engine weekly citation checks.
- Agencies needing per-client workspaces and white-label reports.
- GEO practitioners who want query-level answers and cited-source context.
Consider another option if…
- Buyers needing a full SEO suite or backlink crawler.
- High-assurance teams requiring independent validation or enterprise controls.
- Revenue teams seeking causal traffic and ROI attribution.
02 / Scope, not promises
Features & coverage
- Engine coverage
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI / AI Mode are named; complete model-version and regional coverage is not established.
Archived research · Official product and setup pages checked 2026-10-14.Research excerpt · Five-engine weekly citation checks- Agency sampling and reporting
$149/month includes one client, 40 prompts, three passes, a confidence band, per-client workspace, and white-label reporting; extra clients are listed at $49/month.
Archived research · Official pricing checked 2026-10-14.Research excerpt · Pricing and limits- Independent evidence boundary
AlternativeTo provides third-party listing context and Reddit provides a founder-authored community mention; neither validates product accuracy or outcomes.
Archived research · Third-party pages checked 2026-10-14.Research excerpt · User feedback and evidence quality
Five-engine weekly monitoring
Official pages describe weekly buyer-question checks across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI. This supports documented scope, not complete model or regional coverage.
Verbatim answers and cited sources
The product walkthrough shows answer text, cited domains, source order, competitor context, and query-level movement. Vendor examples do not independently prove completeness or reproducibility.
Agency confidence band and reports
Agency repeats each prompt and engine three times, averages the observations, and includes white-label client reports. This reduces single-shot noise but is not statistical or causal proof.
Evidence boundary
Public evidence supports product scope and pricing, but no checked independent source validates citation accuracy, GEO outcomes, security, or revenue impact.
A focused evaluation workflow
- Run the free 8-prompt check without an account.
- Review the target market and edit generated buyer questions.
- Inspect verbatim answers, cited source order, and competitor slots.
- Compare at least two weekly scans before treating movement as a trend.
- Agencies should compare single-pass and three-pass observations.
- Confirm retention, exports, API, privacy, and regional/model terms before production reporting.
03 / Commercial boundaries
Pricing & limits
Terms below reflect the 2026-10-14 source review, not a new live quote. Confirm currency, billing term, tax and required scope with the provider.
- SMB price
$29/month for one domain and 30 prompts checked weekly across five engines.
Archived research · Official pricing checked 2026-10-14; confirm current terms.Research excerpt · Pricing and limits- Free check
One no-account check with 8 sample prompts across five engines.
Archived research · Official product and pricing pages checked 2026-10-14.Research excerpt · Pricing and limits- Agency sampling and reporting
$149/month includes one client, 40 prompts, three passes, a confidence band, per-client workspace, and white-label reporting; extra clients are listed at $49/month.
Archived research · Official pricing checked 2026-10-14.Research excerpt · Pricing and limits
Pricing context & qualifications
The official pricing page checked 2026-10-14 lists a free one-time check, SMB at $29/month, Agency at $149/month, and $49/month per additional client. Confirm current terms, retention, exports, API, privacy, and regional coverage before purchase.
04 / The tradeoffs
Strengths & weaknesses
Reasons to shortlist
- Five named engines included at the SMB entry tier.
- Verbatim answer and source-order context.
- Agency three-pass sampling and white-label reporting.
- Editable, localized buyer-question workflow.
Reasons to pause
- Independent feedback and controlled testing are sparse.
- Public pages do not establish API, retention, rate-limit, SLA, or complete model policies.
- Single-pass SMB observations remain noisy.
- No checked source proves citations, traffic, conversions, or revenue lift.
AlternativeTo provides third-party listing context and Reddit provides a founder-authored community mention; neither validates product accuracy or outcomes.
05 / Choose by the job
Alternatives to consider
Editorial fit comparisons—not performance rankings or claims that one option always wins.
Peec AI ↗
Peec AI · larger-team source, sentiment, and competitive analytics · higher entry price
Profound ↗
Profound · enterprise AI-search intelligence and procurement · sales-led pricing
06 / What we can substantiate
Reviews & evidence
Public feedback evidence is sparse. AlternativeTo provides third-party listing context, while a Reddit discussion contains a founder-authored description of the product. These signals support public product identity and launch context, not independent validation of AI citation accuracy or GEO outcomes.
AICiteKit assessment: public-source research, not a hands-on product test. Official materials establish stated scope; reviews are dated and may concern the broader platform. Neither establishes guaranteed citations, traffic or revenue.
Sources & original verification dates
| Source | Evidence type | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| WhyIQ AI Radar ↗ | Official product page | |
| WhyIQ AI Radar pricing ↗ | Official pricing page | |
| WhyIQ AI Radar setup guide ↗ | Official documentation | |
| WhyIQ changelog ↗ | Official changelog | |
| AlternativeTo WhyIQ AI Radar ↗ | Third-party listing; review sample not established | |
| Reddit AEO measurement discussion ↗ | Community discussion; founder-authored product mention | |
| CitedIndex WhyIQ AI Radar listing ↗ | Directory discovery source; not quality evidence |
Original review evidence & date context
Preserved from the published research. Dates, review counts and product-scope qualifications below have not been refreshed by this layout migration.
Evidence snapshot
| Source | Public signal | What it supports | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official Radar | Five engines, weekly prompts, free check, answer/source views | Vendor-stated product scope | High for stated behavior; not independent |
| Official pricing | $29 SMB, $149 Agency, $49 extra client, allowances | Published commercial terms | High for published terms |
| Setup docs | Market selection, editable query bank, Agency workspaces and reports | Documented workflow boundaries | Medium; vendor-authored |
| AlternativeTo | Third-party product listing | External identity/context | Low-to-medium; review sample not established |
| Reddit discussion | Founder-authored product mention | Community/launch context | Low; not independent validation |
No checked source independently validates citation accuracy, GEO outcomes, security, compliance, uptime, retention, or revenue impact.
Research notes & unresolved discrepancies
- Official product, pricing, setup documentation, and changelog checked 2026-10-14.
- AlternativeTo and Reddit were used for third-party context; the Reddit mention is founder-authored.
- CitedIndex was used for candidate discovery only, not quality evidence.
- No checked source proves citation accuracy, complete model coverage, rankings, traffic, conversions, revenue lift, security audit, compliance certification, API limits, or enterprise SLA.
Layout migration: October 4, 2026. The original MDX research is retained in the repository; this reorganization does not refresh its factual verification dates.