LLM Pulse

Prices below reflect the official pricing page checked on August 19, 2026. Prices are EUR monthly unless otherwise stated; VAT and applicable taxes are excluded.

Plan	Monthly price	Projects	Prompts	Competitors/project	Response allowance	Tracking	Notable features
Starter	€49	1	50	5	50/week/model	Weekly	CSV, MCP, recommendations, 3 GEO Writer tasks
Growth	€99	2	150	10	150/week/model	Weekly	Sentiment, AI Traffic Analytics, Agent, 5 GEO Writer tasks
Scale	€299	5	450	15	450/week/model	Weekly	Reputation, GEO Testing, ChatGPT Shopping, custom reports, API, Data Studio, 15 GEO Writer tasks
Enterprise	Custom	Custom	Custom	Unlimited listed	Custom	Custom	Additional models, white label, SSO, custom integrations, enhanced security

Annual billing is advertised at a lower monthly equivalent, with the public pricing page listing approximately €41, €83, and €249 per month for Starter, Growth, and Scale respectively when billed annually. Confirm the final checkout amount, tax, currency conversion, cancellation terms, and any agency minimum before purchase.

The public comparison lists unlimited team members. This does not mean unlimited projects, prompts, responses, API calls, or client workspaces.

Evidence snapshot

Source	Public signal	What it supports	Confidence
G2 LLM Pulse profile	5.0/5 from 1 review when checked August 19, 2026	A very small user-satisfaction signal	Low
Capterra LLM Pulse	0 user reviews; product listing and feature description	Product discovery and current listing presence	Low for user experience; medium for listing facts
Capterra methodology	Capterra describes review verification and sponsored-profile disclosure	How to interpret the directory, not product effectiveness	Medium
Trakkr independent review	4.4/5 editorial assessment based on public pricing, product materials, and feature review	Practical workflow observations and tradeoffs	Medium-low; competitor relationship disclosed
Official pricing	€49 Starter, €99 Growth, €299 Scale, custom Enterprise; prompt and feature limits	Commercial terms and plan boundaries	High
Official agency page	Custom branding/domain, client dashboard, white-label reports, partner program	Advertised agency workflow	High for claim existence; not independent proof

Recurring positive themes

The independent sample is too small to claim a broad user consensus. The public product materials and the one available independent review suggest potential strengths around:

• Transparent pricing and a free trial;
• Strong self-serve coverage of five core AI surfaces;
• Prompt, citation, sentiment, and competitor workflows in one platform;
• Agency-oriented multi-project and white-label capabilities;
• Integrations and exports beyond a closed dashboard.

These are supported fit signals, not proof that users consistently achieve better citations or revenue.

Recurring concerns and tradeoffs

The evidence supports several buyer concerns:

• A small review sample makes support and usability difficult to generalize.
• Prompt limits can matter quickly for agencies and multi-market brands.
• The strongest model breadth, security, and white-label terms are Enterprise-oriented.
• Weekly tracking may be insufficient for teams that need rapid experiment feedback.
• Public governance documentation is less detailed than the feature pages.
• Competitor-authored reviews can be useful for tradeoffs but are not neutral.

How much should buyers trust the evidence?

Trust the published price and plan table provisionally because they are direct, date-checked official evidence. Treat the G2 rating as a low-confidence signal because it is based on one review. Treat Capterra as a listing with no user sample. Treat the Trakkr review as a useful but commercially interested comparison: Trakkr is a competing product, so its favorable or unfavorable comparisons should be independently checked.

There is not enough independent evidence to claim that LLM Pulse reliably improves AI citations, traffic, pipeline, or revenue.

AICiteKit interpretation

LLM Pulse has one of the clearer public agency and self-serve stories in this category. Its strongest evidence is commercial transparency and feature breadth; its weakest evidence is independent user scale and independently verified business outcomes. The white-label capability is explicitly advertised, but buyers should confirm the exact Enterprise or agency contract terms before promising a fully rebranded client portal.

What to verify during a trial or demo

1. Create a project for one real brand and add a representative prompt panel.
2. Confirm the exact five AI surfaces and response cadence in your target market.
3. Open full answer records and check whether cited URLs, positions, dates, and locales are visible.
4. Compare the platform’s mention and citation counts with a manually reviewed sample.
5. Test prompt limits, response accounting, historical retention, and export fields.
6. Connect a non-production analytics property and inspect referral definitions before using AI traffic claims.
7. Ask for current security, DPA, subprocessors, retention, deletion, and data-residency documentation.
8. Request a written white-label quote showing custom domain, branding, client permissions, embed mode, report exports, and vendor-brand removal.
9. Confirm whether white label requires Enterprise, a minimum number of projects, annual billing, or an agency-partner agreement.
10. Test a client-facing report with an answer capture, cited URL, recommendation, limitation, and agency branding.
11. Ask what is logged when the LLM Pulse Agent creates prompts, annotations, or GEO Writer tasks.
12. Rerun the same prompt panel after a bounded change rather than judging the product from one answer.

• LLM Pulse pricing — official plan prices, prompts, projects, AI surfaces, response allowances, integrations, white-label placement, and trial; checked August 19, 2026.
• LLM Pulse agency solution — official claims about custom branding, domains, client dashboards, white-label reports, and partner program; checked August 19, 2026.
• LLM Pulse FAQ — official explanations of models, cadence, metrics, exports, API, analytics, and white-label modes; checked August 19, 2026.
• LLM Pulse Agent — official description of the conversational agent and project actions; checked August 19, 2026.
• G2 LLM Pulse profile — 5.0/5 from one review when checked August 19, 2026; low-confidence user evidence.
• Capterra LLM Pulse listing — listing, feature description, and zero-review state; checked August 19, 2026.
• Trakkr LLM Pulse review — competitor-authored practical review; used for workflow tradeoffs and explicitly treated as commercially interested evidence; checked August 19, 2026.
• AICiteKit Otterly.AI review — comparison of monitoring, citation analysis, reporting, and agency limitations.
• AICiteKit GrackerAI review — comparison of B2B SaaS focus, Enterprise controls, and white-label claims.

This page separates official feature and pricing claims from independent user evidence. It does not claim that LLM Pulse guarantees AI citations, rankings, traffic, pipeline, or revenue.